Posted by: lqlq on: October 12, 2009
I am suspending posting until November 1, 2009.
Posted by: lqlq on: October 5, 2009
Traveling this week. Return next week for the continuation of obligations of a board member.
Posted by: lqlq on: October 2, 2009
Assume that your board’s actions are being investigated. Your board is not “transparent” enough. The details of your financial reporting are inadequate. Someone believes that there is hanky-panky going on. How do you prove that you have been exercising fiduciary duty?
Be able to prove that you behave as a fiduciary. It won’t seem important until the investigation begins…
Posted by: lqlq on: October 1, 2009
Board members who are regularly absent from meetings, are inactive, and fail to conduct adequate research (“due diligence”) before making decisions are abdicating their duty of care.
In fact, the fiduciary duty with which a board member is “saddled” is that of the diligence exercised by prudent people in handling their own affairs. How many of us have agonized over the treasurer’s report as much as we have agonized over our own bank statements? Get my drift?
So, consider the worst case scenario. You serve on a board that gets into some trouble. Someone is asking questions or — worse, actively investigating your board and its actions. How do you demonstrate that you have actually exercised your duty of care?
Visit us tomorrow.
Posted by: lqlq on: September 30, 2009
What is the legal obligation known as the “duty of care”?
In line with the “duty of care”, the board member understands that he is a trustee, a fiduciary. As a result, he or she:
The duty of care must be executed with diligence and in good faith. This means that a board member should act in keeping with the charitable mission after adequate deliberation. This includes establishing organizational policy and overseeing the enforcement of the policy by professional staff.
Here is where the duty of care often breaks down. Professional staff are — just that — staff! But many board members simply default to staff and staff recommendations. No matter how wonderful, how competent, how educated, how experienced, how engaging, and how “on top of it” the charitable staff may be, the board member has a duty of oversight. Defaulting to staff is a failure of oversight. And a failure of oversight can lead to personal responsibility if things go south!